LoboVault Home
 

WE’RE FRIENDS, LET’S TALK: RELIGION, SELF-DISCLOSURE AND MANAGING THE OPENNESS AND CLOSEDNESS DIALECTIC IN FRIENDSHIPS

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/9791

WE’RE FRIENDS, LET’S TALK: RELIGION, SELF-DISCLOSURE AND MANAGING THE OPENNESS AND CLOSEDNESS DIALECTIC IN FRIENDSHIPS

Show full item record

Title: WE’RE FRIENDS, LET’S TALK: RELIGION, SELF-DISCLOSURE AND MANAGING THE OPENNESS AND CLOSEDNESS DIALECTIC IN FRIENDSHIPS
Author: Gomez, Sonia Lisette
Advisor(s): McDermott, Virginia
Committee Member(s): Lutgen-Sandvik, Pamela
Burgess, Andrew
Department: University of New Mexico. Dept. of Communication and Journalism
Subject(s): Religion
Self-disclosure
Friendship
Relational Dialectics
Degree Level: Masters
Abstract: The present study investigates college student’s perceptions of the appropriate self-disclosure strategies endorsed when disclosing religiosity. Because self-disclosure patterns can be influenced by whom we are talking to and our estimation of the response, this project also examined friendship levels (i.e., close friend, friend, and acquaintance), the friend’s view of religion (i.e., favorable or unfavorable), and the subject’s own commitment to religion, to determine if they influenced a religious person’s self-disclosure strategy. Based on Relational Dialectics theory, an original instrument, the Self-Disclosure Strategies Questionnaire (SDSQ) was used to measure participant’s endorsement of five self-disclosure strategies. The five self-disclosure dimensions evaluated in the SDSQ are: (a) selection, (b) separation (i.e., segmentation and cyclic alteration), (c) disqualification, (e) moderation, and (f) reframing. Items for the SDSQ were developed using open-ended questionnaires to establish face and content validity. The factorial and construct validity of the SDSQ was tested using confirmatory factor analysis and correlation of three existing communication measures. Results confirmed five subscales with good alphas and construct validity. In addition, the Religious Life Commitment-10 (RCI-10) questionnaire was included to measure each participant’s level of religiosity. Results indicated that selection was the most highly endorsed strategy among participants. However, with regard to friendship type, religious individuals did not feel it was necessary to alter self-disclosures strategies based on the relationship with the recipient. In addition, participants with high and low religious commitment yielded significant differences on three of the strategies: (a) selection, (b) disqualification, and (c) reframing. Also, results indicated that the perception of the recipient’s response (i.e., favorable or unfavorable) has a slight influence on the type of self-disclosure strategies endorsed. The findings of this study extend previous research on friendship maintenance while offering a new lens for self-disclosure research. This research provides a strong foundation for understanding the role of religion in daily interaction, specifically friendship and self-disclosure patterns. The limitations and future directions for the present study are also discussed.
Graduation Date: July 2009
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/9791

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Gomez Sonia_Thesis 2009.pdf 936.5Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account