LoboVault Home
 

Are Urinary Catheters Necessary During Endovascular Procedures? A prospective randomized pilot study

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/9772

Are Urinary Catheters Necessary During Endovascular Procedures? A prospective randomized pilot study

Show full item record

Title: Are Urinary Catheters Necessary During Endovascular Procedures? A prospective randomized pilot study
Author: Knepper, Jordan
Subject(s): Urinary Catheters
Endovascular procedures
Abstract: The use of urethral catheterization in surgery can trace its root to 19th century military surgeons utilizing them to prevent urinary retention after morphine use, and to minimized complications after spinal cord injury [1]. It has become a common surgical practice to place urinary catheters in patients during many interventions [2, 3]. This practice has little support in evidence based literature [4, 5]. In theory a urinary catheter is place to drain the bladder and avoid complications such as over dilatation of the bladder which may result in dystonia [2, 6]. These complications are not well demonstrated in their occurrence and have been poorly examined in short procedures, defined here as those interventions planned to take less than six hours [5, 7].
Date: 2009-08-21
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/9772

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Knepper Final Paper.pdf 28.69Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account