LoboVault Home
 

No somos nada: Ethnicity and Three Dominant and Contradictory Indigenist Discourses in Costa Rica

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/7719

No somos nada: Ethnicity and Three Dominant and Contradictory Indigenist Discourses in Costa Rica

Show full item record

Title: No somos nada: Ethnicity and Three Dominant and Contradictory Indigenist Discourses in Costa Rica
Author: Stocker, Karen
Subject(s): ethnicity, indigenous, Costa Rica, anthropology, history
Abstract: According to many scholars, discourse has the capacity to create the nation rather than simply reflect it. By purporting to objectively describe reality, various texts turn into authoritative voices that determine the ways in which readers perceive that reality. In the case of the Chorotega of Costa Rica to be discussed here, three dominant indigenist discourses--historical,legal, and anthropological-- have formed a trinity of contradictory, yet definitive, authoritative voices regarding the description and definition of Costa Rican indigenous peoples. These three discourses simultaneously create an absence and an ambiguous presence of indigenous peoples in Costa Rica, generally, and of the Chorotega, in particular. History, legal discourse, and anthropology have constructed a vision of the nation which ostensibly intends to assimilate and define indigenous peoples but in practice results in excluding them from the nation as a whole.
Date: 2000-06
Publisher: Latin American and Iberian Institute
Series: LAII Research Paper Series
No. 35
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/7719

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
img018.pdf 14.87Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account