LoboVault Home

The Tension Between Sovereign Immunity and Popular Sovereignty


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/6839

The Tension Between Sovereign Immunity and Popular Sovereignty

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chakeres, Aristede
dc.date.accessioned 2008-08-12T15:57:47Z
dc.date.available 2008-08-12T15:57:47Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1928/6839
dc.description 39 p. ; This student paper has been awarded the 2008 Don G. McCormick Prize. en_US
dc.description.abstract In this paper, I attempt to examine the extent to which the notion of popular sovereignty has affected America’s views on sovereign immunity. This paper does not attempt to settle the ongoing battles about whether the Constitution protects sovereign immunity, although those battles are examined in part because they have produced the most thorough critiques and defenses of sovereign immunity. I examine the debates surrounding the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and Chisholm v. Georgia because those events present insights into how the framers saw the issues of sovereignty and sovereign immunity. Since one framer, James Wilson, had unusually well-developed and pointed views on the topic, his views are examined in detail. I also examine the reasoning of late-20th century state judicial opinions abolishing common law sovereign immunity. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Popular Sovereignty en_US
dc.subject Sovereign Immunity en_US
dc.subject U.S. Constitution en_US
dc.subject U.S. Supreme Court Decisions en_US
dc.subject Common Law en_US
dc.title The Tension Between Sovereign Immunity and Popular Sovereignty en_US
dc.type Other en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Chakeres N_McCormick.pdf 191.6Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


My Account