LoboVault Home
 

Cryptography and Anonymity: Two Reasons Why the First Amendment Favors Peer-To-Peer Technology

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/2917

Cryptography and Anonymity: Two Reasons Why the First Amendment Favors Peer-To-Peer Technology

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wagner, Robyn
dc.date.accessioned 2007-04-13T21:25:27Z
dc.date.available 2007-04-13T21:25:27Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1928/2917
dc.description 70 p. ; An outstanding student paper selected as a winner of the Raymond W. Schowers Prize. en
dc.description.abstract On February 12, 2001, the electronic world watched as the Ninth Circuit returned its unanimous decision against the Napster in A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. Though the service continues to exist with a radically altered business model, many of Napster's users referred to the decision as one that "killed Napster." What the decision did not do, however, was to kill the public's desire to trade files freely, especially music files. Indeed, ever more sophisticated and powerful alternatives to Napster continue to sprout, attracting former Napster users in droves. When Napster was no longer provided a viable means for file sharing was not reduced, it shifted to whatever service could continue to provide access to content. New technologies periodically threaten to eliminate content owners' abilities to enforce their copyrights, and American copyright law has been at odds with such technologies since its inception. In nearly every case, however, copyright has adjusted to the new technology, frequently finding an unexpected trove of revenue for the copyright holders who had so decried the new technology. Examples of such technologies include piano rolls, phonorecords, motion pictures, cable television, photocopiers, video cassette recorders ("VCRs”), and digital audio tapes ("DATs"). Modern file sharing technologies, such as Napster, present yet another such new technology which threatens the rights of copyright holders. The "descendants" of Napster, however, offer something more. By incorporating strong cryptography and anonymity into modem file-sharing systems, they potentially offer unparalleled avenues of speech. The result pits the First Amendment squarely against the Copyright Act in an unprecedented manner. en_US
dc.format.extent 3358116 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Peer-To-Peer Networks en_US
dc.subject File Sharing en_US
dc.subject Napster en_US
dc.subject Copyright Law en_US
dc.subject Copyright Infringement en_US
dc.subject First Amendment en_US
dc.subject Cryptography en_US
dc.subject Anonymity en_US
dc.subject Enforcement en_US
dc.subject Ninth Circuit en_US
dc.subject Federal Court Decisions en_US
dc.subject Copyright Act en_US
dc.title Cryptography and Anonymity: Two Reasons Why the First Amendment Favors Peer-To-Peer Technology en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
WagnerRobyn.pdf 3.202Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account