LoboVault Home
 

The effects of a sexual victimization history, sexual attitudes, and ethnicity on women's sexual assault scripts

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/20992

The effects of a sexual victimization history, sexual attitudes, and ethnicity on women's sexual assault scripts

Show full item record

Title: The effects of a sexual victimization history, sexual attitudes, and ethnicity on women's sexual assault scripts
Author: Leiting, Kari
Advisor(s): Yeater, Elizabeth
Committee Member(s): Venner, Kamilla
Verney, Steve
Department: University of New Mexico. Dept. of Psychology
Subject(s): sexual assault scripts
ethnicity
sexual victimization
sexual attitudes
LC Subject(s): College students--Sexual behavior.
Women college students--Abuse of.
Person schemas.
Risk assessment.
Degree Level: Masters
Abstract: This study examined the effects of a sexual victimization history, sexual attitudes, ethnicity, and proximity of past sexual assault on women’s hypothetical sexual assault scripts. It also compared previously sexually victimized women’s hypothetical sexual assault scripts to their actual assault narratives. Two hundred forty-seven undergraduate women wrote hypothetical sexual assault scripts describing an unwanted sexual experience and completed measures assessing the individual differences variables of interest. Women who reported a victimization history then wrote about their assault experience while women who did not report such history wrote about a bad date or ”hook-up” experience. A coding manual was developed and experts in the sexual violence research area coded the hypothetical scripts and assault narratives. Qualitative analysis revealed several important relationships between the individual differences variables and specific script characteristics. Specifically, victimization history had the most differences related to individual variables. Victimized women included alcohol, consensual kissing, and the context of a party in their hypothetical scripts more frequently than nonvictimized women. They described knowing the man for between one month and one year less frequently than nonvictimized women. Results also indicated distinct incongruence between women’s hypothetical scripts and their actual assault narratives. These results suggest that this relationship should be explored further to understand how women develop and make adjustments to their sexual assault scripts as it could inform the development of prevention programs as well as assist in identifying women at risk for victimization.
Graduation Date: July 2012
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/20992

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Leiting_Thesis Defense OGS.pdf 498.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account