LoboVault Home
 

Evaluation of the laboratory resilient modulus test using a New Mexico subgrade soil

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/20760

Evaluation of the laboratory resilient modulus test using a New Mexico subgrade soil

Show full item record

Title: Evaluation of the laboratory resilient modulus test using a New Mexico subgrade soil
Author: Cabrera, Anthony
Advisor(s): Tarefder, Rafiqul
Committee Member(s): Taha, Mahmoud
Ng, Tang-Tat
Department: University of New Mexico. Dept. of Civil Engineering
Subject(s): Resilient modulus, Pavement design, Cohesive fine-grained subgrade soils
LC Subject(s): Shear strength of soils--Measurement.
Pavements--New Mexico--Subgrades--Testing.
Soils--New Mexico--Testing.
Soil moisture--Measurement.
Degree Level: Masters
Abstract: Resilient modulus (Mr) is a laboratory determined parameter, where a cylindrical specimen is subjected to dynamic axial stresses under confining stresses, while axial deformations are measured. By definition Mr is the ratio of the peak axial stress to the corresponding recoverable axial strain. Currently, there are two accepted laboratory testing protocols for determining Mr, namely AASHTO T 307 and NCHRP 1-28A. These two standards differ from one another in ways that are known to affect Mr, namely in location of load and deformation transducers. One focus of this study is the determination of resilient modulus for an A-6 subgrade soil at varying moisture conditions (± 2-3% relative to optimum). Specimens of 2.8 inch and 4 inch diameters are reconstituted using modified proctor compaction. Resilient modulus values are determined using internal and external deformation measurement techniques. Comparative analyses are performed, and based on the results, a multivariate regression equation has been developed which estimates resilient modulus as a function of gravimetric moisture content and maximum cyclic axial stress for this soil. A second focus of this study is aimed at addressing the potential for reducing the time and complexity required to determine Mr of a cohesive fine-grained subgrade soil. An experimental study is conducted, where unconfined dynamic testing is performed. In this study, load pulse forms and durations differ from standardized tests. Test sequence durations are also reduced. Resilient Modulus values determined from this alternate testing experiment match well with values determined from the standardized test results. Alternate and Standard Mr values are within 15% of each other for 35 of 40 test comparisons, with an average magnitude difference of 9%.
Graduation Date: May 2012
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/20760

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Evaluation of t ... e Soil- Masters Thesis.pdf 2.164Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account