Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRapaport, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-08T18:28:08Z
dc.date.available2012-05-08T18:28:08Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citation4 Buff. Crim. L. Rev. 967 (2001)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1928/20505
dc.description.abstractIn this Article, I will review the matrix in which executive decisions in women's capital clemency cases are made, a matrix supplied by modern equal protection law, the nature and scope of the clemency power, gender politics, and contemporary death row. I will then conduct two thought experiments. Each invented case tests the relevance of gender in legally and politically acceptable contemporary clemency decisions. The goal is to understand the politics and law of granting or denying that very rare boon-commutation of sentence - to a female death row prisoner. The exercise offers support for two conclusions. In the age of formal equality, women cannot be granted clemency simply because they are women. The rhetoric of chivalry is untenable for the contemporary executive. A governor who is courageous and rhetorically skillful, however, can sometimes successfully defend the commutation of the death sentence of a woman as a proper use of the power to grant mercy, done for her sake, the class she exemplifies, the conscience of the governor, and the public.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBuffalo Criminal Law Centeren_US
dc.titleStaying Alive: Executive Clemency, Equal Protection, and the Politics of Gender in Women's Capital Casesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record