Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMathewson, Alfred
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-08T18:31:15Z
dc.date.available2011-06-08T18:31:15Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citation23 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 667 (2008)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1928/12671
dc.description.abstractThis article is about the discourses in law school classes in which non-white students are in classes with white students. While I stake a position distinct from critical race theorists, I do not analyze critical race theory or the large body of scholarship pertaining thereto in this article. I limit my discussion to my use of race in teaching traditional law school subjects, specifically antitrust and corporate law. I present this article in two parts. In Part I, I describe the challenges of using critical race theory to introduce discussions of race in traditional law school subjects. Race is interjected as an outsider. In Part II, I present my race in ordinary course approach. I do not suggest that my approach is superior to Critical Race Theory; I offer it only as another avenue of discussing race. In my approach, the subject matter drives the analysis and race is visibly interwoven into conventional legal analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSt. John's University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleRace in Ordinary Course: Utilizing the Racial Background in Antitrust and Corporate Law Coursesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record