Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMathewson, Alfred
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-08T18:31:15Z
dc.date.available2011-06-08T18:31:15Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citation23 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 667 (2008)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1928/12671
dc.description.abstractThis article is about the discourses in law school classes in which non-white students are in classes with white students. While I stake a position distinct from critical race theorists, I do not analyze critical race theory or the large body of scholarship pertaining thereto in this article. I limit my discussion to my use of race in teaching traditional law school subjects, specifically antitrust and corporate law. I present this article in two parts. In Part I, I describe the challenges of using critical race theory to introduce discussions of race in traditional law school subjects. Race is interjected as an outsider. In Part II, I present my race in ordinary course approach. I do not suggest that my approach is superior to Critical Race Theory; I offer it only as another avenue of discussing race. In my approach, the subject matter drives the analysis and race is visibly interwoven into conventional legal analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSt. John's University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleRace in Ordinary Course: Utilizing the Racial Background in Antitrust and Corporate Law Coursesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.data.json{ "@context": { "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#", "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#", "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" }, "@graph": [ { "@id": "http://hdl.handle.net/1928/12671", "@type": "http://schema.org/CreativeWork", "http://schema.org/author": { "@id": "http://54.191.234.158/entities/resource/Mathewson_Alfred" }, "http://schema.org/dateCreated": "2008", "http://schema.org/description": "This article is about the discourses in law school classes in which non-white students are in classes with white students. \n\nWhile I stake a position distinct from critical race theorists, I do not analyze critical race theory or the large body of scholarship pertaining thereto in this article. I limit my discussion to my use of race in teaching traditional law school subjects, specifically antitrust and corporate law. I present this article in two parts. \n\nIn Part I, I describe the challenges of using critical race theory to introduce discussions of race in traditional law school subjects. Race is interjected as an outsider. In Part II, I present my race in ordinary course approach. I do not suggest that my approach is superior to Critical Race Theory; I offer it only as another avenue of discussing race. In my approach, the subject matter drives the analysis and race is visibly interwoven into conventional legal analysis.", "http://schema.org/encodingFormat": "23 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 667 (2008)", "http://schema.org/inLanguage": "en_US", "http://schema.org/isPartOf": { "@id": "http://hdl.handle.net/1928/6982" }, "http://schema.org/name": "Race in Ordinary Course: Utilizing the Racial Background in Antitrust and Corporate Law Courses" }, { "@id": "http://hdl.handle.net/1928/6982", "@type": "http://schema.org/WebSite" }, { "@id": "http://54.191.234.158/entities/resource/Mathewson_Alfred", "@type": "http://schema.org/Person" } ]}


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record