LoboVault Home

Why Conical Pots? An Examination of the Relationship among Vessel Shape, Subsistence, and Mobility


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/10861

Why Conical Pots? An Examination of the Relationship among Vessel Shape, Subsistence, and Mobility

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Helton-Croll, Claire K.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-25T22:07:48Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-25T22:07:48Z
dc.date.issued 2010-06-25T22:07:48Z
dc.date.submitted May 2010
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1928/10861
dc.description.abstract This study examines the functional relationship between ceramic cooking vessel shape and subsistence and mobility using vessels from Navajo and Towa-speaking Puebloan groups from the Protohistoric period (A.D. 1450-1700) in the southwestern United States. Conical shape vessels are found in association with mobile foragers throughout the past. Navajo peoples produced Dinetah and Navajo Gray wares, both of which have conical bases. Towa-speaking Puebloan peoples from the Jemez and Pecos areas produced rounded-base cooking vessels. The Navajo and Towa-speaking Puebloans practice different subsistence and mobility strategies. The primary goal of this research was to determine if variation in cooking vessel form was the result of this cultural variation. This research employed reviews of available ethnohistorical and archaeological data, analysis of archaeological specimens, and experimental testing of reproductions. Ethnohistorical and archaeological data provide evidence for variation in types of food resources exploited, food preparation techniques, and mobility strategies. The seasonally mobile early Navajo depended heavily on wild plant resources and supplemented their diet with agricultural resources. The Towa-speaking Puebloan groups were primarily reliant on agricultural resources and occupied large year-round settlements with seasonal dispersal of a portion of the population to attend to agricultural fields. Analysis of archaeological specimens, using both whole vessels and sherds, showed substantive variation between the cooking vessels of the two groups that can potentially relate to transportability, thermal stress resistance, and thermal efficiency. Experimental testing of reproductions based on archaeological whole vessels also provided evidence for differences in strength, thermal stress resistance, and thermal efficiency. Results suggest that variation in cooking vessel form is more strongly related to variation in diet and cooking strategies than to mobility. Additional research is needed to further elucidate the cultural relationships examined here. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship National Science Foundation en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Southwest Archaeology en_US
dc.subject Ceramics en_US
dc.subject Expermental Archaeology en_US
dc.subject prehistoric cooking vessels en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Navajo pottery
dc.subject.lcsh Pueblo pottery
dc.subject.lcsh Pottery craft--Social aspects--Southwest, New
dc.subject.lcsh Southwest, New--Antiquities
dc.title Why Conical Pots? An Examination of the Relationship among Vessel Shape, Subsistence, and Mobility en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.description.degree Anthropology en_US
dc.description.level Doctoral en_US
dc.description.department University of New Mexico. Dept. of Anthropology en_US
dc.description.advisor Crown, Patricia
dc.description.committee-member Boone, James
dc.description.committee-member Towner, Ronald
dc.description.committee-member Blinman, Eric

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Final.pdf 10.57Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


My Account