LoboVault Home
 

The Prevalence of Osteoarthritis in Wild vs Captive Great Ape Skeletons

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/10303

The Prevalence of Osteoarthritis in Wild vs Captive Great Ape Skeletons

Show full item record

Title: The Prevalence of Osteoarthritis in Wild vs Captive Great Ape Skeletons
Author: Poe, Demelza
Advisor(s): Pearson, Osbjorn M.
Committee Member(s): Edgar, Heather
Jurmain, Robert
Buikstra, Jane E.
Bedrick, Edward
Department: University of New Mexico. Dept. of Anthropology
Subject(s): Osteoarthritis
apes
wild vs captive
chimpanzee
gorilla
orangutan
disease
LC Subject(s): Apes--Diseases
Apes--Aging
Bones--Analysis
Osteoarthritis--Animal models
Medical anthropology
Degree Level: Doctoral
Abstract: This research examined whether the prevalence and skeletal distribution of osteoarthritis (OA) differed between wild and captive great ape skeletons. A secondary, but important, aspect of this research focused on the development of improved aging techniques based on methods commonly used on human osteological samples. Tests were conducted pertaining to the effect that wild versus captive status, sex, and species has on vertebral body lipping, marginal lipping, and eburnation. Age was considered a co-factor. Of the aging methods examined, use of the basilar suture to distinguish between adult and old adult specimens proved to be very imprecise. The ribs and auricular surface proved to be of limited value in aging the ape skeletons, while the acetabulum demonstrated potential for use as an aging indicator, although it is not recommended for use in isolation. Molar dental wear proved to be the most viable single indicator of age explaining over 78% of the variation seen. However, a model that combined wear of molars 1 and 2 with certain features of the acetabulum explained over 90% of the variation seen and was the model chosen for aging the apes in this sample. The effect that wild versus captive status, sex, and species had on vertebral body lipping, eburnation, and marginal lipping was analyzed, with age as a co-factor. It was found that status is a significant predictor of the prevalence of both vertebral body lipping and marginal lipping, but not of eburnation with captive apes suffering significantly more vertebral body lipping than wild apes. Sex is not a significant predictor of disease prevalence for any skeletal marker. Species’ differences are evident in vertebral body lipping and marginal lipping, but not in eburnation. In general, chimpanzees are the least frequently affected and gorillas the most frequently affected. Age has an effect, primarily in vertebral body lipping and marginal lipping, with older individuals being more affected than younger individuals. In summary, while wild versus captive status, species’ differences, and age are factors in the development of vertebral body lipping and marginal lipping in many joints, the presence of eburnation is extremely rare in the great apes with very few individuals being affected regardless of status, sex, species, or age. Thus, the results highlight the complex nature of osteoarthritis and enforce the idea that osteoarthritis is markedly multi-factorial and that disease prevalence and patterns are not easily understood or interpreted.
Graduation Date: December 2009
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/10303

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Poe-dissertation 1109.pdf 6.706Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account