Fallacies of American Constitutionalism

Authors

Christian G. Fritz, University of New Mexico - School of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

Summer 2004

Abstract

Fallacies of American Constitutionalism' examines the pervasive assumptions in the scholarship of historians, lawyers, and political scientists that impute the central role of the federal Constitution to how Americans understood written constitutions after their Revolution. American struggles to come to grips with the meaning of the sovereignty of the people before and after 1787 reveals very different views about the people as the sovereign from those reflected in the federal Constitution and dispel the notion that our prevailing constitutional view is an unbroken chain stretching back to 1787.

Publication Title

Rutgers Law Journal

Volume

35

First Page

1327

Keywords

American Constitutionalism, Written Constitutions, Popular Sovereignty, Historiography, Constitutional Tradition, Sovereignty of the People, Federal Constitution, Constitutional Revision, PeopleΓÇÖs Sovereignty, Federal Constitutional Convention

Recommended Citation

Christian G. Fritz, Fallacies of American Constitutionalism, 35 Rutgers Law Journal 1327 (2004).
Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship/187