LoboVault Home
 

Old Blood, Bad Blood, and YoungBlood: Due Process, Lost Evidence, and the Limits of Bad Faith

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/7653

Old Blood, Bad Blood, and YoungBlood: Due Process, Lost Evidence, and the Limits of Bad Faith

Show full item record

Title: Old Blood, Bad Blood, and YoungBlood: Due Process, Lost Evidence, and the Limits of Bad Faith
Author: Bay, Norman
Abstract: Under the law of lost evidence, absent a showing of bad faith, no due process violation occurs when the police lose potentially exculpatory evidence. This is so even though the evidence may be critical to the defense and even though post-conviction DNA testing has exonerated more than 200 individuals. Ironically, the case that developed that rule of law, Arizona v. Youngblood, is founded on the conviction of an innocent man. This Article critically examines Youngblood and provides a conceptual framework for examining the constitutional right of access to evidence. Supreme Court precedent reflects two different, sometimes competing, visions of procedural due process: adjudicative fairness to the accused or an instrumental focus on deterring official misconduct. In Youngblood, instrumentalism trumped adjudicative fairness. Moreover, four compelling developments in the twenty-one years since Youngblood was decided—scientific advances, legislative reform, state judicial disapproval, and doctrinal incoherence—have eroded its rationale and legitimacy.
Date: 2008
Publisher: Washington University School of Law
Citation: 86 Wash. U. L.R. 241 (2008).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/7653

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Old Blood Bad Blood and Youngblood.pdf 353.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account