Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThompson, Bruce Evan
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-13T21:28:36Z
dc.date.available2007-04-13T21:28:36Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1928/2930
dc.description13 p. ; An outstanding student paper selected as a winner of the Don G. McCormick Prize.en
dc.description.abstractI intend for this paper to lay a basic groundwork for defense counsel in New Mexico to use in the preservation and advocacy of criminal defendants' state constitutional claims. It bears stating at the outset that perhaps the greatest pitfall for an advocate in this field is for one to make the assumption that, because the New Mexico Supreme Court has refused to grant a particular constitutional protection in the past, that ruling cannot be successfully challenged in the future. For reasons that will become clear, New Mexico's "interstitial" approach to constitutional jurisprudence permits (and in fact encourages) appellate review of earlier rulings that were based solely on an interpretation of the federal constitution.en_US
dc.format.extent669369 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionalityen_US
dc.subjectNew Mexico Constitutionen_US
dc.subjectUnited States Constitutionen_US
dc.subjectInterstitialismen_US
dc.subjectNew Mexico Supreme Courten_US
dc.subjectCriminal Defendantsen_US
dc.subjectState Court Decisionsen_US
dc.titleRaising and Preserving for Review Claims for Expanded Protections for Criminal Defendants under the New Mexico State Constiutionen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record