LoboVault Home

Regional Priorities: A Comparison of Dispute Resolution Procedures Under NAFTA Chapter 11 and the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/2928

Regional Priorities: A Comparison of Dispute Resolution Procedures Under NAFTA Chapter 11 and the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation

Show full item record

Title: Regional Priorities: A Comparison of Dispute Resolution Procedures Under NAFTA Chapter 11 and the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation
Author: Myers, Joshua
Subject: NAFTA
North American Free Trade Agreement
Dispute Resolution
North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC)
Maquiladora
National Administrative Offices (NAO)
Chapter 11 (NAFTA)
United States
Mexico
Canada
Abstract: This paper will argue that NAFTA was written with a bias in favor of protecting the rights of investors and over protecting the rights of the workers of Mexico, the US and Canada. Specifically, this paper focuses on the submissions or reports of violations of Mexican federal labor law in the maquiladora zone submitted to the United States National Administrative Offices (NAO) and the claims filed under Chapter 11 of NAFTA. The paper will begin with background on prior US-Mexico investment programs, leading up to the passage of NAFTA. This will include a discussion of Fast Track legislation and the political pressures that lead to the inclusion of the "side agreements," North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) and the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. Next, the paper will examine the most recent cases submitted under NAALC regarding the maquiladora zone, and all Chapter 11 filings. Then, both dispute resolution mechanisms will be evaluated and compared by asking two questions of each dispute resolution process: who decides the dispute? And, what can an aggrieved person expect to recover from filing a claim? These two questions highlight the benefits and structural weaknesses of both dispute resolution mechanisms.
Date: 2003
Description: 53 p. ; An outstanding student paper selected as winner of the Don G. McCormick Prize.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/2928


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
MyersJoshua.pdf 2.241Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Browse

My Account