LoboVault Home

Victim of "Another B.I.A. Blunder:" Individual Indian Title and the General Allotment Act


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/2921

Victim of "Another B.I.A. Blunder:" Individual Indian Title and the General Allotment Act

Show full item record

Title: Victim of "Another B.I.A. Blunder:" Individual Indian Title and the General Allotment Act
Author: Petersen, Pete
Subject: Navajo Nation
Land Allotment
Individual Indian Title
Right of Occupancy
Land Claims
New Mexico
Supreme Court Decisions
Federal Court Cases
Executive Orders
Indian Treaties
Tribal Law
Tribal Courts
Abstract: Navajo tribal members are in dispute over tribal ancestral lands, one claiming a right from a federal allotment patent and the other asserting individual aboriginal rights. In 1909, an allotment application for an allotment was made on behalf of Reuben Mariano for land then located outside the boundaries of the Navajo Indian reservation. The allotment patent was issued pursuant to the General Allotment Act for land in northwest New Mexico. Mariano never lived on the tract because Mary Bah Arviso and her family were settled there. Mariano argued that although his patent was not issued until 1964, his application for an allotment was accepted in 1909 which gives him a right to the land. Mary Bah Arviso and her daughter Grace Tsosie claim title to the land because Arviso and her family have aboriginal ownership that has not been extinguished by Congress. In 1994, the United States, acting as trustee, for Ruben Mariano, a Navajo allottee, brought a common law trespass and ejectment action against Grace Tsosie, also a Navajo, for land which is located outside of the Navajo 1868 treaty reservation boundaries but within an executive order reservation. This paper will address Grace Tsosie's claim to her ancestral home, asserting "individual Indian title." Part I will address the Indian right of occupancy and how individual Indian title evolved from it. Part II covers the facts of Tsosie's individual Indian title claim and its litigation history. Part III discusses Tsosie's land claim under two theories: Navajo tribal customary use right and "individual Indian title." I will argue Tsosie has established both tribal customary use rights and "individual Indian title" and that they have not been extinguished by congressional action.
Date: 1999-06-28
Description: 27 p. ; An outstanding student paper selected as a Honors Paper.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/2921

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
PetePeterson.pdf 1.377Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


My Account