LoboVault Home
 

Palazzolo v. Rhode Island: Clarification and More Confusion on the Notice Issue

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/2913

Palazzolo v. Rhode Island: Clarification and More Confusion on the Notice Issue

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dawes, Jaime L.
dc.date.accessioned 2007-04-13T21:24:31Z
dc.date.available 2007-04-13T21:24:31Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1928/2913
dc.description 38 p. ; An outstanding student paper selected as a winner of the Helen S. Carter Prize. en
dc.description.abstract The United States Supreme Court recently decided a takings case that many hoped would provide much needed guidance regarding takings claims brought by those who acquire property with notice of existing or impending restrictions. Until the recent case of Palazzolo v. Rhode Island the Supreme Court had hardly addressed the so-called "notice issue" that has frequently arisen in state and lower federal courts. In the absence of definitive direction from the Supreme Court, lower courts treated preexisting limitations in different ways, many finding notice to defeat an otherwise potentially successful claim for just compensation. en_US
dc.format.extent 1832092 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Notice Issue en_US
dc.subject Supreme Court Decisions en_US
dc.subject State Court Decisions en_US
dc.subject Federal Court Decisions en_US
dc.subject Claims en_US
dc.subject Rhode Island en_US
dc.subject Regulatory Takings en_US
dc.title Palazzolo v. Rhode Island: Clarification and More Confusion on the Notice Issue en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
DawesJaime.pdf 1.747Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account