Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHurley, Regina M.
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-13T21:24:19Z
dc.date.available2007-04-13T21:24:19Z
dc.date.issued2001-03-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1928/2912
dc.description48 p. ; An outstanding student paper selected as a Honors Paper.en
dc.description.abstractPart One of the paper provides the background of the plenary power doctrine and reviews the evolution of immigration law over the subsequent century in light of the doctrine. Part Two discusses the Ma and Zadyvdas decisions in the lower courts as examples of both the schizophrenic nature of immigration jurisprudence and evidence of the necessity for the Supreme Court to narrow the use of the plenary power doctrine.en_US
dc.format.extent1163746 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectImmigration Lawen_US
dc.subjectPlenary Poweren_US
dc.subjectFederal Court Casesen_US
dc.subjectSupreme Court Casesen_US
dc.subjectIllegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA)en_US
dc.subjectImmigration and Nationality Act (INA)en_US
dc.titleA Supreme Challenge: Reducing Judicial Reliance on the Plenary Power Doctrine in Immigration Lawen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record