Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRapaport, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-08T18:21:18Z
dc.date.available2012-05-08T18:21:18Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.citation49 SMU L. Rev. 1507 (1996)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1928/20503
dc.description.abstractIn this Article I will challenge the tendency to discount the severity of domestic homicide, a phenomenon I call "the domestic discount." I will argue against automatic mitigation-the imputation of provocation or diminished capacity-simply or merely because the relationship" between victim and defendant is domestic or sexually intimate. I will argue that the traditional hot blood/cold blood dichotomy is an imperfect guide to the moral grading of homicide offenses. In particular, reliance on it has led to the under evaluation of the seriousness of some domestic homicides. It is my contention, or hypothesis, that the conclusions I draw from the study of capital domestic cases can be generalized to the entire domain of domestic homicides: If homicide laws were purged of patriarchal values, the remaining principles that underlie our grading of homicide offenses would be consistent with the rejection of a domestic discount; the worst domestic murders like the worst predatory murders would rank among the most reprehensible crimes.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSouthern Methodist University. School of Lawen_US
dc.titleCapital Murder and the Domestic Discount: A Study of Capital Domestic Murder in the Post Furman Eraen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record