LoboVault Home

The Fight of the Century: The Regulation and Reform of Prizefighting in Progressive Era America

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/12995

The Fight of the Century: The Regulation and Reform of Prizefighting in Progressive Era America

Show full item record

Title: The Fight of the Century: The Regulation and Reform of Prizefighting in Progressive Era America
Author: Frisbee, Margaret
Advisor(s): Hutton, Paul
Committee Member(s): Ball, Durwwod
Cahill, Cathleen
Nugent, Walter
Department: University of New Mexico. Dept. of History
Subject: boxing
reform
sport
El Paso
New York
San Francisco
Nevada
Texas
California
corruption
vice
Jim Corbett
Bob Fitzsimmons
Jim Jeffries
Jack Johnson
LC Subject(s): Boxing--United States--History
Boxing--Law and legislation--United States--History
Boxing--Social aspects--United States--History
Progressivism (United States politics)--History
Degree Level: Doctoral
Abstract: This dissertation considers the symbolic, social, and political conflict between heavyweight prizefighters and progressive reformers from 1892 to 1910. That time frame encompasses the careers of champions “Gentleman” Jim Corbett, Bob Fitzsimmons, Jim Jeffries, and Jack Johnson. Their fights to win or defend the heavyweight title were planned for California, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Florida, and New York, among other places. By protesting them at every stop, reformers sought to prevent the permanent establishment of prizefighting as a legitimate business, even as the fame of these fighters elevated the sport to the highest level of popularity that it had enjoyed to that time. The fundamental battle of prizefight reform pitted local and state governments against each other in a contest over the regulatory control of American morality. In the process of resolving that question, states accrued more power for themselves and weakened the strength of civil authorities in villages, towns, and cities across the United States. Although reformers throughout the country categorized prizefighting as a vice and damned it with fairly uniform rhetoric, cultural insecurities and political anxieties specific to states or regions were the real motivations for enacting or enforcing prizefight legislation. Cultural, political, and economic pressures planted on state governors by people other than moral reformers proved to be much more powerful instruments of change than the vocal minority’s genuine belief in progress.
Graduation Date: December 2010
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/12995
Item Available: 2016-12-31


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Frisbee_Dissertation.pdfBlocked 1.446Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Browse

My Account