LoboVault Home
 

Comparison of monotherapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angtiotensin receptor blockers in improving health outcomes among veteran patients with type 2 diabetes

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/12866

Comparison of monotherapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angtiotensin receptor blockers in improving health outcomes among veteran patients with type 2 diabetes

Show full item record

Title: Comparison of monotherapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angtiotensin receptor blockers in improving health outcomes among veteran patients with type 2 diabetes
Author: Campbell, Heather
Advisor(s): Khan, Nasreen
Raisch, Dennis W.
Committee Member(s): Borrego, Matthew E.
Murata, Glen H.
Sather, Mike R.
Department: University of New Mexico. College of Pharmacy
Subject(s): Cardiovascular
Kidney
Chronic
Disease
Receptor
LC Subject(s): Non-insulin-dependent diabetes--Chemotherapy.
Angiotensin converting enzyme--Inhibitors.
Angiotensin II--Antagonists.
Degree Level: Doctoral
Abstract: Diabetes is a world-wide epidemic; 90-95% of diabetes cases are type 2 in nature. Albuminuria and hypertension are risk factors of diabetes complications, specifically nephropathy and cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended as monotherapy to reduce albuminuria and hypertension. Because of this, we sought to compare patients with type 2 diabetes (P2DM) who received neither therapy to those who received either monotherapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cardio- and cerebro- vascular disease, and all-cause mortality. Additionally, because there are very limited data on comparisons between ACEI and ARB therapies, none of which compare occurrence of incident cardio- or cerebro- vascular disease or mortality, these monotherapies were compared. Moreover, because diabetes incidence is expected to increase, healthcare utilization was also analyzed. This longitudinal study followed P2DM maximally for five years. Comparisons between patients receiving neither therapy and either monotherapy were performed with multivariate logistic or negative binomial regression, while comparisons between ACEI and ARB patients were performed with propensity score weighted logistic or negative binomial regression. Compared to neither therapy, ACEI patients were associated with lower odds of ESRD, higher odds of incident cardio- or cerebro- vascular disease events, lower odds of mortality, and higher incidence rates of healthcare utilization. Treatment selection existed between ACEI and ARB monotherapies in P2DM, necessitating propensity score analysis (PSA). Fortunately, the PSA balanced between group characteristics and had substantial overlap in propensity scores between groups, allowing for precise estimates of causal interpretation. No differences were found between ACEI and ARB monotherapies for all endpoints studied. Since only associations can be found between comparisons of ACEI and ARB patients with neither patients and because ACEIs or ARBs are recommended in guidelines, significance is focused on comparisons between ACEI and ARB patients. This is the second study lasting more than a year comparing outcomes of ACEI and ARB monotherapies for nephropathy and the first study comparing ACEI and ARB monotherapies for other endpoints. This study confirms that ACEIs and ARBs have no significant difference in effects for two years mean follow-up. Until this study, similar effects have only been assumed.
Graduation Date: May 2011
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/12866

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
dissertation_wsigs_04_25_111.pdf 1.128Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account