LoboVault Home

Effect of an aeroelastic film on confined subsonic cavity resonance

LoboVault

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/12833

Effect of an aeroelastic film on confined subsonic cavity resonance

Show full item record

Title: Effect of an aeroelastic film on confined subsonic cavity resonance
Author: Carter, Melissa
Advisor(s): Truman, C. Randall
Committee Member(s): Vorobieff, Peter
Razani, Arsalan
Department: University of New Mexico. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
Subject: Film, Subsonic, Cavity flows
LC Subject(s): Thin films.
Aeroelasticity.
Resonators, Cavity.
Degree Level: Masters
Abstract: EFFECT OF AN AEROELASTIC FILM ON CONFINED SUBSONIC CAVITY RESONANCE by Melissa Carter B.S., Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, 2001 M.S., Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, 2011 ABSTRACT Two shallow three-dimensional cavities were used to study the effect on cavity resonance of an aeroelastic film placed on the wall opposite the cavity in confined (duct) flow. Flow speeds were very low subsonic with Mach number varying from 0.05 to 0.10. The cavities have length-to-depth ratios of 2.5 and 1.5, with identical depths. It was expected that the aeroelastic film in flutter would interact with acoustic signals from the cavity to enhance or inhibit cavity pressure oscillations. Two different film tensions were applied to the film to affect flutter conditions. However, the film support mechanism design did not allow flutter, and each film experienced static displacement caused by outside air pressure. Cavity sound data recorded by a microphone was compared for tests with and without the film. The effects of film tension were insignificant, primarily because the film was not in flutter. The longer cavity exhibited higher sound pressure levels over the entire range of frequencies with an aeroelastic film present. The shorter cavity showed smaller differences, perhaps because the film is longer than the cavity. The presence of an aeroelastic film did affect the shear-layer frequencies in the cavities. For Cavity 2, higher amplitude peaks in the range of estimated resonance frequencies were observed with the film present. The results for the longer cavity indicate that a film on the opposite wall will interact with cavity pressure oscillations to affect sound pressure levels in resonance.
Graduation Date: May 2011
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/12833


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
CarterthesisApr15.pdf 3.898Mb PDF View/Open Entire Thesis

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


Browse

My Account