LoboVault Home

U.S. Press Representation of the Southern Sudanese Civil War, 1983-2005


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/10917

U.S. Press Representation of the Southern Sudanese Civil War, 1983-2005

Show full item record

Title: U.S. Press Representation of the Southern Sudanese Civil War, 1983-2005
Author: Zerai, Abdissa
Advisor(s): Cramer, Janet
Committee Member(s): Collier, Mary Jane
Rodriguez, Ilia
Shunkuri, Admasu
Department: University of New Mexico. Dept. of Communication and Journalism
Subject: media
LC Subject(s): Sudan--History--Civil War, 1983-2005--Press coverage
War--Press coverage--United States--History--20th century
War--Press coverage--United States--History--21st century
Degree Level: Doctoral
Abstract: The study examines how the U.S. print news media discursively represented the civil war that raged from 1983-2005 between southern Sudan and the central government in the north over the tenures of three successive war-time Sudanese administrations. The study was situated within the broader theoretical umbrella of cultural studies. However, the theory of representation and postcolonial theory served as the principal theoretical frames for the study. Employing critical discourse analysis, with framing as a strategy, the study focused on five U.S. print news media outlets (three national newspapers and two national newsmagazines): The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Christian Science Monitor, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report. News articles published on the subject in the selected print news media outlets over the entire stretch of the civil war were collected and analyzed. The analysis revealed that the narratives of the selected print news media discursively constructed an ethno/racial-religious frame as a colonizing frame in talking about the southern Sudanese civil war. With respect to the portrayal of the warring parties (southern forces and three war-time Sudanese administrations), a shift of narratives was observed over the entire civil war period. While the ethno/racial-religious discursive angle remained the same throughout the civil war period, the news narratives’ portrayal of the warring parties oscillated depending on the nature of Washington’s policy toward Khartoum’s regimes. It was argued that the news discourse of the civil war focused exclusively on the ethno/racial-religious dimension in explaining the locus of the southern Sudanese civil war, and in so doing, excluded the role of colonial legacy, which could have shared the same discursive terrain, as an important explanatory factor for the southern Sudanese predicament. This colonial legacy, among other things, encompasses the institution of the north-south divide, the emergence of a sectarian political structure, and the contribution of the Condominium in the Sudanese national identity crisis. The study outlines the implications of such representations and portrayals and articulates some of the loci of the U.S. news media’s analytical impoverishment with respect to reporting events on the African continent. Finally, the study makes some suggestions as to what the U.S. news media might do to improve the way they cover crises on the continent.
Graduation Date: May 2010
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1928/10917

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Abdissa final submission.pdf 1.169Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UNM Libraries

Search LoboVault


My Account